With apologies to Charles Dickens, it was the best of times, it was the worst of times. Compare these two scenes at lunch counters.
February 1, 1960, four young black college students walked into a F.W. Woolworth store in Greensboro, North Carolina. They bought a few items and went to the lunch counter and asked to be served. They knew they probably would not be served because the Woolworth chain practiced segregation and refused to serve blacks. The four young men sat quietly at the counter until closing time, when they peacefully left. They returned the following day, dressed in suits, white shirts, and ties. They sat at the lunch counter, and respectfully asked to be served. When they were refused, the men sat at the counter, studying their textbooks, until the business closed and they left. These four young men inspired a movement that soon grew to include over 70,000 participants all over the south. The behavior of these young men changed the racist views of people all over the south. You should check this page to learn more about the sit-in movement.
April 21, 2011, a McDonald's restaurant in the Baltimore area. Two young black women, one 18, the other 14 attacked and beat a young woman in front of the restroom area of the restaurant. The restaurant was not crowded, but in the video recorded by a McDonald's employee, at least three other young black men were present and watching the beating. Early in the video, the manager (one of the males present) steps toward the beating victim and herds one of the attackers away while he picks up something off the floor. He turns his back as the attackers rush back in and begin kicking the victim in the head. The manager is not seen again in the video, although he is heard complaining that she is "bleeding on my ****ing floor." The one person who does try to help is an older, probably early 60's, white woman. The older woman may have prevented the assault from becoming a murder. The attackers try to drag the victim, by her hair, out the front door. The older woman is able to stop them by standing over the victim as she is being dragged. The attackers drop the victim, but continue to kick her in the head and stomach until she begins to have seizures. According to the police report, one of the attackers punched the older woman in the face before leaving. By the way, leaving at the urging of the employees because the police are coming, and "she's bleeding, yo!" If you have the stomach for it, you can see the video posted by the now former McDonald's employee.
What would those four young men at the Woolworth's counter in 1960 think of the inaction of the men at the McDonald's in 2011? Imagine the four young men from 1960 in the 2011 McDonald's. What do you think they would've done? Imagine the four young men from 2011 in the 1960 Woolworth's. What do you think they would've done?
Showing posts with label civil rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil rights. Show all posts
Monday, April 25, 2011
A Tale of Two Lunch Counters
Labels:
1960,
2011,
action,
beatdown,
beating,
civil rights,
lunch counter,
mcdonald's,
police,
sit-in,
woolworth
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Tell Me, Who Are You?
Here's my daily football reference. The featured band at this past year's Super Bowl was The Who. Thanks to CSI on television, their most well-known song is Who Are You. That's a question we should be hearing a lot between now and November's elections.
I read a lot of news and opinions from sites as diverse as Big Government and The Huffington Post. Even more informative than the articles themselves are the comments that follow. On one site, you will see a lot of "Obama's the anti-christ" type comments. Of course on the other, they claim that it's all Bush's fault, you racist! Read enough of the comments, and you really start to worry about where our country is heading, and even more importantly, why our politicians are encouraging the division. There is very little discussion of the topic. Mainly a lot of name-calling. Both sides of our national arguments strongly believe they are right, and that the other side is stupid, evil, or possibly just stupidly evil.
In the past four months or so, I have become a Glenn Beck fan. The thing that first attracted me to his show was his level-headedness. He would lay out the facts, tell his listeners to check them out for themselves, and then decide for themselves. He has never, at least that I have heard, read, or seen, said that our president or his supporters were evil. Beck has repeatedly said that they have an agenda for the transformation of America. That happens to be a progressive/socialist agenda and they have been very upfront about their intentions, but only if you are listening. The progressives truly believe that their plan is what is best for America. Beck has also said that he believed that when he laid out the facts, the national media would take the story and run with it and the American public would wake up. Well, the national media has not covered the story. They seem to be part of the progressive/socialist movement. So then Beck laid out the connections between the media (GE-owned NBC networks), the president, Al Gore, Fannie Mae, the economic collapse, the global warming hoax, the cap and trade legislation, and the trillions of dollars the legislation would bring to each of them. Still no public outrage.
So, for the sake of comparison, say you see flames bursting out of the upstairs window of a crowded theater. You run inside yelling "fire!!!" Only a few patrons glance your direction. So you yell louder. Still no response. You run outside, take a picture with your handy dandy cell phone camera. Run back inside, waving the photo over your head, while still screaming "fire" at the top of your lungs. When only a couple of patrons follow you outside, you get mad. Now, instead of trying to inform the movie-goers of the danger they are in, you start name-calling. "Moron" comes to mind. How can they not see the peril. They just must be stupid. Maybe in reality, they are very cold-natured. Burning the theater for warmth is the best idea they have. They truly believe you are a conspiracy theory loving idiot; they are not trying to kill everyone. A really big fire is the best way to get warm.
Ok, it's a stretch. But that's where we are as a nation. While Beck and others are yelling "socialism, you idiots," Obama, Ayers, Van Jones, and NBC are yelling, "we know, you idiots!" We've got stop the name-calling and birth certificate checking and educate ourselves and those great masses of uninformed about what is really at stake. Progressive sounds good. We all like progress, right? Well, kind of like the change we were promised, we'd better find out what we are progressing toward. History does not paint a very pretty picture of past socialist movements.
And history is what we all need to learn. A big part of the country is waking up to the fact that the progressive movement began to change our history almost a century ago. The changes to the Texas curriculum could be a start in the change back to the truth. David Barton was part of the board that made the changes. Check out his book, Original Intent for the real history of our founders, especially their belief that they were led by God. As Barton says repeatedly, the founders were Christians. Our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. The founders did not believe in government sponsoring a religion, but neither was religion banned from government.
Another extremely hot topic is race. So, take a look at Barton's American History in Black and White. It tells the true roles of black Americans in the formation of our country, starting with patriots who were instrumental in the winning of the revolution. The 3/5 compromise (slaves only counted as 3/5 a citizen in deciding representation in Congress) was a powerful anti-slavery provision. That's not Barton's opinion, Glenn Beck's, or mine. That's the opinion of Frederick Douglas. Just in case you went to public school between 1980 and today, Douglas was a former slave and abolitionist leader who became great friends with Abraham Lincoln. At first glance, it looks like the founders believed that blacks should not count as a whole person. Then think logically. When counting population to determine representation, southern slave states wanted slaves counted. Northern states said, they count when freed. Southern states threatened not to sign the Constitution, so a 3/5 compromise was reached. Founders such as Jefferson, Franklin, and John and Samuel Adams believed that slaves would be eventually freed in response to the free market and in order to increase southern states' representation. But counting slaves for representation would only tilt the congress toward making slavery permanent. When was the civil rights bill first passed? How about during the Grant (R) administration. Some was overthrown by courts, then the rest repealed by the Wilson (D) administration. Who re-introduced it? Eisenhower (R) re-introduced it. It never made it out of a Democratic senate. Kennedy(D) and Johnson(D) both voted against it. The vast majority of Americans believe that Republicans have consistently fought against rights for minorities and that Democrats have been leaders in the fight for equality. At least since President Lincoln (R) got it all started. But we all know that he would be a Democrat today!
Those are just some of the things that were taught at one time. We need to learn why the texts were changed and make sure all Americans know true American history. Americans need to make informed decisions at the next election. We need to know who we are and where we want to go. We can't again vote for change without asking "change to what?" Obama's idea of what America is, is not my idea of what America is.
Glenn Beck is very good at distilling issues to their core. On his television show today, he said Americans need to look to the summer of 1969. Are we the Americans that went to the moon? Or are we the Americans who, three weeks after the moon landing, rolled in the mud smoking pot at Woodstock? As Pete Townsend and Roger Daltrey of The Who (they played at Woodstock by the way) asked, "Who are you?"
I read a lot of news and opinions from sites as diverse as Big Government and The Huffington Post. Even more informative than the articles themselves are the comments that follow. On one site, you will see a lot of "Obama's the anti-christ" type comments. Of course on the other, they claim that it's all Bush's fault, you racist! Read enough of the comments, and you really start to worry about where our country is heading, and even more importantly, why our politicians are encouraging the division. There is very little discussion of the topic. Mainly a lot of name-calling. Both sides of our national arguments strongly believe they are right, and that the other side is stupid, evil, or possibly just stupidly evil.
In the past four months or so, I have become a Glenn Beck fan. The thing that first attracted me to his show was his level-headedness. He would lay out the facts, tell his listeners to check them out for themselves, and then decide for themselves. He has never, at least that I have heard, read, or seen, said that our president or his supporters were evil. Beck has repeatedly said that they have an agenda for the transformation of America. That happens to be a progressive/socialist agenda and they have been very upfront about their intentions, but only if you are listening. The progressives truly believe that their plan is what is best for America. Beck has also said that he believed that when he laid out the facts, the national media would take the story and run with it and the American public would wake up. Well, the national media has not covered the story. They seem to be part of the progressive/socialist movement. So then Beck laid out the connections between the media (GE-owned NBC networks), the president, Al Gore, Fannie Mae, the economic collapse, the global warming hoax, the cap and trade legislation, and the trillions of dollars the legislation would bring to each of them. Still no public outrage.
So, for the sake of comparison, say you see flames bursting out of the upstairs window of a crowded theater. You run inside yelling "fire!!!" Only a few patrons glance your direction. So you yell louder. Still no response. You run outside, take a picture with your handy dandy cell phone camera. Run back inside, waving the photo over your head, while still screaming "fire" at the top of your lungs. When only a couple of patrons follow you outside, you get mad. Now, instead of trying to inform the movie-goers of the danger they are in, you start name-calling. "Moron" comes to mind. How can they not see the peril. They just must be stupid. Maybe in reality, they are very cold-natured. Burning the theater for warmth is the best idea they have. They truly believe you are a conspiracy theory loving idiot; they are not trying to kill everyone. A really big fire is the best way to get warm.
Ok, it's a stretch. But that's where we are as a nation. While Beck and others are yelling "socialism, you idiots," Obama, Ayers, Van Jones, and NBC are yelling, "we know, you idiots!" We've got stop the name-calling and birth certificate checking and educate ourselves and those great masses of uninformed about what is really at stake. Progressive sounds good. We all like progress, right? Well, kind of like the change we were promised, we'd better find out what we are progressing toward. History does not paint a very pretty picture of past socialist movements.
And history is what we all need to learn. A big part of the country is waking up to the fact that the progressive movement began to change our history almost a century ago. The changes to the Texas curriculum could be a start in the change back to the truth. David Barton was part of the board that made the changes. Check out his book, Original Intent for the real history of our founders, especially their belief that they were led by God. As Barton says repeatedly, the founders were Christians. Our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. The founders did not believe in government sponsoring a religion, but neither was religion banned from government.
Another extremely hot topic is race. So, take a look at Barton's American History in Black and White. It tells the true roles of black Americans in the formation of our country, starting with patriots who were instrumental in the winning of the revolution. The 3/5 compromise (slaves only counted as 3/5 a citizen in deciding representation in Congress) was a powerful anti-slavery provision. That's not Barton's opinion, Glenn Beck's, or mine. That's the opinion of Frederick Douglas. Just in case you went to public school between 1980 and today, Douglas was a former slave and abolitionist leader who became great friends with Abraham Lincoln. At first glance, it looks like the founders believed that blacks should not count as a whole person. Then think logically. When counting population to determine representation, southern slave states wanted slaves counted. Northern states said, they count when freed. Southern states threatened not to sign the Constitution, so a 3/5 compromise was reached. Founders such as Jefferson, Franklin, and John and Samuel Adams believed that slaves would be eventually freed in response to the free market and in order to increase southern states' representation. But counting slaves for representation would only tilt the congress toward making slavery permanent. When was the civil rights bill first passed? How about during the Grant (R) administration. Some was overthrown by courts, then the rest repealed by the Wilson (D) administration. Who re-introduced it? Eisenhower (R) re-introduced it. It never made it out of a Democratic senate. Kennedy(D) and Johnson(D) both voted against it. The vast majority of Americans believe that Republicans have consistently fought against rights for minorities and that Democrats have been leaders in the fight for equality. At least since President Lincoln (R) got it all started. But we all know that he would be a Democrat today!
Those are just some of the things that were taught at one time. We need to learn why the texts were changed and make sure all Americans know true American history. Americans need to make informed decisions at the next election. We need to know who we are and where we want to go. We can't again vote for change without asking "change to what?" Obama's idea of what America is, is not my idea of what America is.
Glenn Beck is very good at distilling issues to their core. On his television show today, he said Americans need to look to the summer of 1969. Are we the Americans that went to the moon? Or are we the Americans who, three weeks after the moon landing, rolled in the mud smoking pot at Woodstock? As Pete Townsend and Roger Daltrey of The Who (they played at Woodstock by the way) asked, "Who are you?"
Labels:
Ansel Adams,
change,
civil rights,
CSI,
democrat,
franklin,
glenn beck,
hope,
jefferson,
johnson,
kennedy,
Lincoln,
moon landing,
progressive,
republican,
socialist,
the who,
woodstock
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)