Well, the most important election of our lifetime is over. How many times did you hear both sides use that phrase? "The most important election of our lifetime." Now the reality hits. We lost. Lots of experts, so-called experts, wannabe experts, everyday people, and conspiracy theorists are weighing in with their opinion of why we lost. We lost because religious voters stayed home. We lost because Latino voters didn't like the phrase "self-deportation." We lost because women want free birth control. We lost because unemployed welfare moms don't want to give up their Obama-phone. We lost because of election fraud. These are just a few of the reasons I have heard from experts of varying degrees of credibility. I think there is a bigger reason that we lost. I am afraid that, at least to a very large portion of our population, the truth doesn't matter.
Wednesday morning, the day after the election, a friend posted comments on Facebook about how hateful and mean so many of the comments were. She then mentioned a Tweet from Tim Tebow on Monday. Something to the effect of, "don't worry about the early election results tomorrow. The Democrats will have an early lead. Then the Republicans will get off work and vote." She gloated about Tebow being so wrong, and in fact the opposite actually happened. I'm not a huge Tebow fan, but I do respect him a lot, and that just didn't sound like something he would say. So I typed "Tim Tebow election tweet" into a Google search. The very first response was about the fake Tim Tebow tweet being re-tweeted more than 17,000 times already. It took me all of 5 seconds to find the truth and another minute to read the article to make sure it was a credible source. I didn't want to post on my friend's Facebook timeline, thinking it might be embarrassing to her, so I sent a private message just listing the link that I found. She responded in minutes, saying she thought it was probably a hoax, but she just likes to argue. She didn't care about the truth, only about "winning." She said she votes based on a couple of issues that are important to her and actually did not do ANY research into Romney's stand on these issues! I changed the subject at that point because she admitted to having absolutely zero interest in the truth, only in arguing.
There were so many WTH!? moments on election evening. Pennsylvania going to President Obama was one of the big ones. When he says he plans to bankrupt the state's largest industry, coal, did they not believe him? Or did they just not care to learn his position? It's not like it's a secret, if you have enough interest in the truth to look.
But at least he respects the people of Pennsylvania and their beliefs, right? Well, not exactly. He says they "bitterly cling to their guns and their religion," specifically speaking about residents of Pennsylvania.
Virginia not only depends on the coal industry, but the military as well. In the last presidential debate, the president says that the mandatory cuts to the military that would happen on the first of the year came from Congress' suggestion, not from him. And that if he has his way they will never happen anyway. Bob Woodward says that Obama was "mistaken." In interviews for his book, The Price of Politics, the White House Office of Management Director and the Legislative Affairs Director both told Woodward that the idea for sequestration came from the White House and was presented to Senate Majority Leader Reid before being suggested to Congress. So Woodward gives the president the benefit of the doubt, he was just mistaken about where the idea originated. The very next day, the president touts his idea of sequestration to produce a cut in the deficit in an off the record interview with the Des Moines Register. No talk of a deal to prevent the mandatory cuts to military or Medicare payments to doctors, as he claimed the prior evening. He lied period. In spite of his promise to cut their number one industry, coal; and boasting about cuts coming to their number two economic engine, the military, Virginia voted for Obama. Not only that, the Des Moines Register called the president on his lies and demanded that the off the record interview be made public. Based on his interview and on the fact that he lied either during the debate or in their interview, the Register endorsed the Republican candidate for the first time in 40 years. Iowa voted for Obama.
Ohio was crucial for a Romney win. Obama hit Romney hard about his stand on the bailout of GM and Chrysler. He said that Romney wanted the two automakers to go out of business. He said that Romney was in favor of letting the automakers go bankrupt and lose all their jobs in Michigan and Ohio. These claims led to a pretty heated exchange in the debates. Finally ending with the president saying "let the people read it for themselves." And Romney saying "yes, please do." The editorial is out there and easy to find. In it Romney does advocate a managed bankruptcy to allow the companies to restructure and provide government guarantees for loans by private lenders. Did it matter to voters or even to the president that the truth was on Romney's side? Apparently not. The day after the debate, fact checkers - even those normally firmly backing the president, said the president was wrong in his debate claims. But the president was in Dayton, OH repeating his false claims. And in spite of the Detroit Free Press' endorsement of Romney, both Michigan and Ohio voted for Obama.
The biggest and probably most important lie of all involves the death of Ambassador Stevens, former Navy Seals and CIA contractors, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, and State Dept. Information Officer Sean Smith in Benghazi. This incident, our president's response to it and its aftermath defines who we are as a country. Do we still have the policy of "no man left behind?" Initial evidence says not any more. Hopefully Congress, the press, and the American public are still interested enough to push for the truth about this attack and our White House's response to it.
As Fox Mulder used to say on The X-Files, "the truth is out there." It's truly not hard to find either. It matters. The question is, do we care anymore? If not, we really have lost. And we are lost as well.
By the way, did you know Iran fired on a U.S. drone over international waters on the Friday before the election? Thought not. It's true. It's out there, if you are interested in looking.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The truth is important? Like claiming that all Jeeps are going to be made in China? That kind of truth. Romney lied and didn't work. Deal with it.
ReplyDeleteYes, the truth is important. Romney quoted an article on Bloomberg. Here's the link. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-21/fiat-says-china-may-build-all-jeep-models-as-suv-demand-climbs.html
DeleteSpeaking of the truth. You may want to watch the video of the CEO of GM in China talking about their plans to expand in China, including research and development jobs. Possibly another reason the Detroit Free Press endorsed Romney. Here's the video of the comments directly from the mouth of Daniel Akerson.
http://youtu.be/Lvl5Gan69Wo?t=1m
As the saying goes, "who are you going to believe, me or your own lying eyes." Obama got away with it, because too many of us didn't even bother to use our eyes.