Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? That's journalism simplified. I took journalism in Mrs. Kirtley's 8th grade class and learned that, even in the Jr. High Newspaper, a journalist will answer those questions. It's that simple. When was the last time you read or watched or heard a news report that answered those questions about an important event? Let's take a look at a couple of current events and see what we have learned from our "journalists."
Last night our federal government avoided the fiscal cliff. The United States would have "gone over the cliff" if an agreement on taxes and spending cuts was not reached between the Democrats in the White House and in the Senate who want to deal with our $16,000,000,000,000 (the 12 zeroes make more of an impact than just "trillion," doesn't it?) debt and the Republican controlled House of Representatives who want to cut spending to deal with the $16,000,000,000,000 debt. The president campaigned on a balanced approach that would ask the wealthiest to pay more in taxes and cuts in spending to start to rein in the out of control debt. Both sides agree that deficit spending is "unsustainable." Who? The House of Representatives, the Senate, and President Obama. What? Agreed on a deal that would raise tax rates for individuals making over $400,000 a year and families making over $450,000 a year. Agreed on "future" spending cuts to be negotiated by the end of February, conservative estimates of $10 of tax increases for every $1 of spending cuts or realistic estimates of $410 in tax increases for every $1 cut. That's Washington D.C.'s definition of a "balanced approach." Where? That is an easy one, in Washington D.C. When? Another easy one, last night. How? Through negotiations between Vice President Biden and Senator McConnell in the Senate and a yes vote in the House that included all Democrats and 84 Republicans. Here's the important one that is almost never answered by "journalists." Why? Why do Democrats, including the president, insist on raising taxes on high earners even though the increase in taxes collected will not fund even one month's spending? Why did 84 Republicans, including the Speaker of the House, go against their principles and agree to raising taxes on 77% of the population when you include increases through the loss of the payroll tax cut and the new Obamacare taxes in addition to the negotiated tax rate increase on the "rich" or "more fortunate" with no guarantee of ANY spending cuts at all? "Journalists" have not answered the why, so we can come to our own conclusion. But first lets look at a couple of more current events and answer these same basic questions.
Who? Adam Lanza. What? Killed 28 people, himself, his mother, six adult teachers and school staff, and 20 kindergarten students. When? The morning of December 14, 2012. Where? Sandy Hook Elementary School, Newtown, Connecticut. How? With a gun. Why? Starts getting a little unclear here again, but if you look to the solutions offered by the president, lawmakers like Harry Reid, Senator Diane Feinstein, New York City Mayor Bloomberg, "reporters" like Piers Morgan of CNN, and the majority of Hollywood, since their solution to the mass murder problem is more restrictive gun control laws; the gun is the answer to both how and why. We all know it's the answer to how, although it's not clear exactly what type of gun was used, maybe we can look into that question in another post. Is it really also the answer to why? Can an object, a tool, be a reason why? Is a rock why Cain killed Abel? Is an ax why Lizzie Borden killed her family? Is a knife why someone killed O.J. Simpson's ex-wife? Is a derringer why John Wilkes Boothe killed Abraham Lincoln? Is an airplane why terrorists killed 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001? Seems a little illogical to have a weapon as a reason. So let's take a look at another set of questions.
Who? Progressives, President Obama, Vice President Biden, Senators Biden and Feinstein, Mayor Bloomberg, reporter Piers Morgan, Hollywood in general. What? Promoting tighter gun control laws, up to the complete overturning of the 2nd Amendment. When? As soon as possible. Where? In the United States. How? Through federal law or regulations, or as the president put it, "under the radar." Why? Supposedly to prevent another tragedy like the Sandy Hook Elementary murders. But if the gun is not the reason for the murders, can eliminating or restricting access to guns be the solution? If it's not, then what is the why, for the what - gun control laws?
The answer to why takes a little more work, a little more thought. I was taking the journalism class shortly after the Watergate scandal, and actually read Woodward and Bernstein's
All the President's Men in 7th grade. One thing I learned from reading that book is that lust for power is a common motive, or a common reason why. Another is greed, or lust for money. Hatred is a motive. Rage is a motive. Jealousy or envy is a motive. Sometimes there might not be a motive, just flat out evil is the reason why. Of course there are good motives too. The most basic is love, whether it's the motive for working to take care of your family or the reason for donating to the local food bank. At its most basic, love is the motive for any positive action.
So back to the why for the first "what" in this post, the fiscal cliff deal reached by our legislative branch and the president. Why would both parties agree to raise taxes and not cut spending when both sides agree that our deficit is a major problem and raising taxes will not reduce it? Let's be generous and say the reason is love. Both sides don't want to cut social programs like Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, public housing, unemployment benefits, and on and on and on because they have such a heartfelt love for their fellow man. Basically our government is the parent that just cannot say no. They give their children (us) everything we want and some things we don't want, even though they have maxxed out all the credit cards and it will be up to our grandchildren and great grandchildren to pay them off. But they do it because they have such love for all of us.
Yeah. Right. What's the more likely motive? Lust for power, lust for money, or most likely a combination of the two. What better way to consolidate a politician's position than by taking from a small group to pay for benefits to a larger group. If there was anything learned this past November, it was, as one pundit said "personal responsibility will lose out to Santa Claus every time."
The second "what" listed above, Adam Lanza's killing spree. Why did he do it? There are reports of mental health issues. Speculation about medications he may have been taking. The bottom line is that the only possible motivation for killing 20 kindergartners is evil. Pure evil. Killing his mother and even the officials at the school could be motivated by rage, jealousy, or hatred, especially when combined with mental health problems and medication. But killing children? Evil. There is no other explanation.
That brings us to the motive for the response to the murders. Just as there is no way to legislate "good," there is no way to legislate to prevent "evil." Good and evil just are. They exist. But as humans, we all feel the need to do something to prevent a mass murder, especially of children, from ever happening again. Many, maybe even the majority, of the people pushing for new tighter gun control laws are doing so out of the need to just do something, anything, in response to the tragedy. They know, deep inside, maybe even subconsciously, that there is absolutely nothing we can do to completely eliminate evil. Because there is nothing to be done to stop the "why," they target the "how"-the tool, the gun. Again, the basic motive here is love, the need to make sure that no other young lives are lost and no other families or communities have to feel the pain of such loss. But for some; the president, Senators Reid and Feinstein, Mayor Bloomberg, Michael Moore, and others, the motivation once again is a lust for power. They have the need to control us, their subjects. As the president's former chief of staff and current mayor of the United States' murder capitol (Chicago), Rahm Emmanuel said, "never let a crisis go to waste. They give you the opportunity to accomplish things you would never be able to accomplish otherwise." Those motivated by a lust for power are pushing hard to accomplish legislation with this fresh crisis that they have been trying unsuccessfully for years to accomplish. They are using those with other motivations to help them. Once again, Stalin's definition of useful idiots applies.
I think in the next few posts, we should take a look at other current events and issues and see if we can answer not just the who, what, when, where, and how, but the why as well.
+with+quote+sized+for+web.jpg)
Posts
